Case Study

Kenyon Mills Nature-Like Fishway

The Kenyon Mills Nature Like Fishway created pockets of wetland habitat between the weirs.

Challenges

The neighboring community did not support full dam removal due to concerns about the impacts of lowered water levels on residential wells upstream. In addition, Kenyon Mills owned the dam and was willing to have it removed, but needed the impoundment for fire suppression.

Solutions

Construction crews implemented a partial dam removal and installed a rock ramp, or nature-like fishway spanning the full width of the river channel. The dam height was lowered and a rock ramp was constructed to create the riffles and flow necessary to sustain fish passage with a gradual incline in elevation.

Successes

Creating a nature-like fishway provided fish passage while allowing for the impoundment to remain upstream, providing water for fire suppression and ensuring that the upstream wells would not lose drinking water. In addition, during low flow, the rock ramps provide diverse habitat along the river’s edge.

References and Additional Resources

Wood Pawcatuck Watershed Association’s presentation: http://www.wpwa.org/documents/KenyonPublicPresentation%20(3).pdf

Turek, J., A. Haro, and B. Towler (2016). Federal Interagency Nature-like Fishway Passage Design Guidelines for Atlantic Coast Diadromous Fishes. Interagency Technical Memorandum.

Location
Richmond, Rhode Island
River
Pawcatuck River
Year
2013
Type
River Wide Nature-Like Fishway
Cost
$1,124,322
Project Partners
Wood Pawcatuck Watershed Association; Kenyon Industries, Inc.; Town of Richmond; Trout Unlimited; United States Fish and Wildlife Service; RI Coastal Resources Management Council; RI Department of Environmental Management; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Save the Bay; Richmond Conservation Commission; USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service; American Rivers; and Narragansett Bay Estuary Program

The Dam Atlas is a guide for communities to understand, evaluate, and make decisions about historic dams.

New England is home to more than 14,000 dams, many of which are small, “legacy” structures built over a century ago. Most no longer serve their original industrial purposes and are reaching the end of their useful lives, raising concerns about safety, maintenance, and ecological impacts. These aging dams can threaten downstream communities, especially as climate change brings more frequent and intense storms. While dam removal is often advocated for ecological, economic, and safety reasons—such as restoring fish passage, water quality, and sediment flow—many communities feel a strong attachment to their local dams. Dams and their impoundments have become part of the landscape, local history, and sense of place, sometimes even serving as town landmarks or symbols of cultural identity.

The goal of this website is to share this work and support communities who are making decisions about the future of a dam. Decisions about dams are inherently complex and require the consideration of ecological, social, safety, and economic trade-offs. While there are many great resources and publications for proponents of dam removal, this website aims to provide an unbiased source of information on the ecological and social considerations associated with dam decisions. Rather than advocating solely for removal, the goal of this approach is to bring a community into an open conversation to think creatively about the future of a dam. While this may seem counterintuitive if your role is to advocate for dam removal, engaging communities in an open but structured discussion about the future of a dam has the potential to lead to better environmental outcomes and a community that has more ownership, connection, and sense of stewardship over their river. In addition, this approach has the potential to address what are often perceived as unequal power dynamics between dam removal proponents and the local community, which has led to projects stalling or failing in the past.

This website consists of four main sections: The first chapter, “Understanding Dams,” introduces key ecological, social, infrastructural, and economic factors that are important to consider for the management of dams at the individual and watershed scale. The second part, “Scenarios & Case Studies,” looks at various alternatives for the future of a dam and presents a series of case studies of projects throughout the region. The third chapter, “Making Decisions,” shares methods, ideas, and tools for how to engage in conversations about the future of a dam. The last section, the Interactive Dam Atlas, was developed in collaboration with faculty from the University of Rhode Island and helps to visualize and build a geographic understanding of dams in the Narragansett Bay and Rhode Island coastal watersheds.

While this Dam Atlas is focused on dams in the Narragansett Bay and coastal watersheds of Rhode Island, the metrics calculated in the GIS analysis can be applied to other watersheds, and the decision-making tools are not region-specific. By sharing our methods and the open-source decision support toolkit, the aim is to help support practitioners and communities that are looking for ideas, methods, and techniques for having discussions about the future of a dam. We encourage others to use, test, modify, evolve, and share these methods. Ultimately, the goal is for this work to contribute to a “library of approaches” that are openly shared to build knowledge and techniques to support collaborative environmental decision-making around dams.